Which statement about succession plan strength is true?

Which statement about succession plan strength is true?

• A. It is also known as plan bench strength.
• B. It is a numerical score calculated from candidate metrics.
• C. It is a non-calculated description determined by the number of candidates in the plan and their readiness.
• D. It is not used in succession planning.

Answer: (C)

Succession plan strength is a qualitative gauge of how robust the talent pipeline is for critical roles. It describes, in descriptive terms, how many candidates exist in the plan and how ready they are to step into those roles, rather than applying a numeric calculation. For example, a plan with several ready-now successors and others ready within a year would be described as strong, while a plan with only a single candidate who isn’t ready would be described as weak. This descriptive approach helps you see where gaps exist and where development is needed, without reducing the assessment to a single score. Though bench strength is related terminology, the strength itself here is about the descriptive assessment of pool size and readiness, not a calculated numeric metric.

Succession plan strength is a qualitative gauge of how robust the talent pipeline is for critical roles. It describes, in descriptive terms, how many candidates exist in the plan and how ready they are to step into those roles, rather than applying a numeric calculation. For example, a plan with several ready-now successors and others ready within a year would be described as strong, while a plan with only a single candidate who isn’t ready would be described as weak. This descriptive approach helps you see where gaps exist and where development is needed, without reducing the assessment to a single score. Though bench strength is related terminology, the strength itself here is about the descriptive assessment of pool size and readiness, not a calculated numeric metric.